Links go to a downloadable PDF of the citation.

Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M. D., Douglass, S., Lebière, C., & Qin, Y. (2004). An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review, 111, 1036-1060.

Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., & Lebiere, C. (1996). Working memory: Activation limitations on retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 221 – 256.

Anderson, J. R., Taatgen, N. A., & Byrne, M. D. (2005). Learning to achieve perfect time sharing: Architectural implications of Hazeltine, Teague, and Ivry (2002). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(4), 749-761.

Botvinick, M., & Plaut, D. C. (2004). Doing without schema hierarchies: A recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action. Psychological Review, 111, 395 – 429.

Botvinick, M. M., & Bylsma, L. M. (2005). Distraction and action slips in an everyday task: Evidence for a dynamic representation of task context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12 (6), 1011 – 1017.

Botvinick, M. M., & Plaut, D. C. (2006a). Such stuff as habits are made on: A reply to Cooper and Shallice (2006). Psychological Review, 113 (6), 917 – 928.

Byrne, M. D. (2003). A mechanism-based framework for predicting routine procedural errors. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsh (Eds.) Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.

Byrne, M. D., & Bovair, S. (1997). A working memory model of a common procedural error. Cognitive Science. 21(1), 31-61.

Byrne, M. D., Maurier, D., Fick, C. S., & Chung, P. H. (2004). Routine procedural isomorphs and cognitive control structures. In C. D. Schunn, M. C. Lovett, C. Lebiere & P. Munro (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (pp. 52-57).

Card, S. K., Moran, T. P., & Newell, A. (1983). The psychology of human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Chung, P. H. (2006). Changing the interface with minimal disruption: The roles of layout and labels. Doctoral dissertation, Rice University, Houston, TX.

Chung, P. H., & Byrne, M. D. (in press). Cue effectiveness in mitigating postcompletion errors in a routine procedural task. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies.

Cooper, R. P., & Shallice, T. (2000). Contention scheduling and the control of routine activities. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17, 297–338.

Cooper, R. P., & Shallice, T. (2006a). Hierarchical schemas and goals in the control of sequential behavior. Psychological Review, 113, 887–916.

Cooper, R. P., & Shallice, T.(2006b) Structured representations in the control of behavior cannot be so easily dismissed: A reply to Botvinick and Plaut (2006). Psychological Review, 113, 929 – 931.

Elman, J. L. (1990). Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science, 14, 179 –211.

Fennell, K., Sherry, L., Roberts, R. J., & Feary, M. (2006). Difficult access: the impact of recall steps on flight management system errors. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 16(2), 175-196.

Fu, W. T., & Gray, W. D. (2004). Resolving the paradox of the active user: Stable suboptimal performance in interactive tasks. Cognitive Science, 28, 901–935.

Gray, W. D., & Boehm-Davis, D. A. (2000). Milliseconds matter: An introduction to microstrategies and to their use in describing and predicting interactive behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6 (4), 322 – 335.

Gray, W. D., & Fu, W. T. (2004). Soft constraints in interactive behavior: The case of ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head. Cognitive Science, 28, 359 – 382.

Gray, W. D., Sims, C. R., Fu, W. T., Schoelles, M. J. (2006). The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior. Psychological Review, 113 (3), 461 – 482.

John, B. E. (2003). Information processing and skilled behavior. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.) HCI models, theories, and frameworks: Toward a multidisciplinary science. San Francisco: Morgan-Kaufmann (pp. 55 – 101).

Kieras, D. E. (1999). A guide to GOMS model usability evaluation using GOMSL and GLEAN3 (Technical Report). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

Landauer, T. K., and Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211 – 240.

Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P., and Laham, D. (1998). Introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259 – 284.

Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior: The Hixon symposium (pp. 112–146). New York: Wiley.

Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. Davidson, G. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self regulation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). New York: Plenum Press.

Rasmussen, J. (1983). Skills, rules, and knowledge: Signals, signs, and symbols, and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 13 (3), 257 – 266.

Rasmussen, J., & Jensen, A. (1974). Mental procedures in real-life tasks: A case study of electronic trouble shooting. Ergonomics, 17 (3), 293 – 307.

Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Reason, J. T., & Mycielska, K. (1982). Absentminded? The psychology of mental lapses and everyday errors. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Schwartz, M.F., Montgomery, M.W., Buxbaum, L.J., Less, S.S., Carew, T.G., Coslett, H.B., Ferraro, M., Fitzpatrick-De Salme, E.J., Hart, T., & Mayer, N.H. (1998). Naturalistic action impairment in Closed Head Injury. Neuropsychology, 12(1), 13 – 28.

Schwartz, M.F., Montgomery, M.W., Fitzpatrick-De Salme, E.J., Ochipa, C., Coslett, H.B., & Mayer, N.H. (1995). Analysis of a disorder of everyday action. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 12(8), 863 – 892.

Schwartz, M.F., Reed, E.S., Montgomery, M.W., Palmer, C., & Mayer, N.H. (1991). The quantitative description of action disorganisation after brain damage: A case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8(5), 381–414.

Taatgen, N. A. (2005). Modeling parallelization and flexibility improvements in skill acquisition: From dual tasks to complex dynamic skills. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 421-455.

Taatgen, N. A., Huss, D., Dickison, D. & Anderson, J. R. (in press). The acquisition of robust and flexible cognitive skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.

Wood, S. D. (2000). Extending GOMS to human error and applying it to error-tolerant design. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan, 2000). UMI Microform No. 9991016.

Wood, S. D., & Kieras, D. E. (2002). Modeling human error for experimentation, training, and error-tolerant design. Proceedings of The Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation & Education Conference.

Last modified 2008.07.29